Lettera bipartisan al Presidente Obama

81 membri del Congresso USA hanno firmato una lettera chiedendo al Presidente Obama di garantire i fondi necessari per il mantenimento della leadership in campo spaziale.

In particolare fanno riferimento al report della U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee, che ha raccomandato un budget annuale di almeno 3 miliardi di $.

Ecco il testo integrale:
[i]Dear President Obama,

As Members of Congress who greatly value the contributions of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to our nation, we appreciate the hard work of the U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee. With its final report available now, we look forward to renewed communications between the Administration and Congress about America’s human space flight program. We write in strong support of receiving a Fiscal Year 2011 budget request which truly supports this core element of NASA’s mission.

While evaluating options for future of human space exploration, the Augustine Committee concluded that regardless of the direction or the details of the program, an increased level of long-term, sustainable funding must be a major component. The Review Committee’s finding that, “Human exploration beyond low-Earth orbit is not viable under the FY 2010 budget guideline” demonstrates that NASA’s underfunded budgets over the past several years have slowed the pace of exploration, depleted resources, and frustrated the development of new space systems. We believe an increased level of funding is essential to ensure NASA has the resources needed to meet the mission challenges of human space flight.

Currently, NASA is funding the development of the next generation human space flight systems with partners that bring decades of experience in developing and operating complex space systems while also encouraging new entrants to the space flight industry. The $3 billion annual increase recommended by the Committee would not fully restore the funding originally budgeted for the next generation programs. However, the increase would make a considerable difference in our ability to have a space exploration program to ensure that our nation maintains its global leadership position. A significant investment must be made given NASA’s contributions to America’s economic and national security.

The International Space Station (ISS) should remain operational as long as it can be productive without being constrained by an arbitrary, budget-driven termination date. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 designated the ISS as a U.S. National Laboratory to conduct research for other Federal agencies and the commercial sector. Extending the ISS, at least through 2020, is necessary in order to maintain and improve important international partnerships, maximize the return on our nation’s investment, and spur discoveries that will enable exploration of our universe and improve life here on Earth.

As you may know, NASA is supported by tens of thousands of highly skilled and experienced men and women who make up the civil servant and contractor workforce. These space professionals are a critical national resource and contribute to a vital industrial base that supports civil, military, and commercial space. If we allow a gap in human space flight our nation will have lost valuable skills that will be costly and difficult to replace. In addition, we also will have given up on our hard-won space preeminence over other nations, including Russia and China, who will surely step in to fill the void.

We wish to impress upon you the significant and fleeting opportunity we have to ensure that our nation continues its preeminence in human space flight. Instituting a cohesive and comprehensive plan with clear direction for NASA’s future policies depends on leadership and the commitment to follow through with adequate funding. This can only be accomplished if it is established as a national priority through Presidential leadership.

We know that you share with us the enthusiasm that is generated by a bold human space flight program. We look forward to receiving your Administration’s proposal and working with you to ensure a robust, cutting edge and inspirational human space flight program worthy of our great nation.

Sincerely,

Suzanne Kosmas (D-FL) Ken Calvert (R-CA) Joe Barton (R-TX) Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) Rob Bishop (R-UT) Alan Boyd (R-FL) Kevin Brady (R-TX) Corrine Brown (D-FL) Henry Brown (R-SC) Ginny Brown Waite (R-FL) Vern Buchanan (R-FL) Anh ‘Joseph’ Cao (R-LA) Lois Capps (D-CA) Michael Capuano (D-MA) John Carter (R-TX) Kathy Castor (D-FL) Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) Judy Chu (D-CA) Gerald Connolly (D-VA) Ander Crenshaw (R-FL) John Culberson (R-TX) Elijah Cummings (D-MD) Arthur Davis (D-AL) Danny Davis (D-IL) Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL) Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) David Dreier (R-CA) Chet Edwards (D-TX) Randy Forbes (R-VA) Marcia Fudge (D-OH) Louie Gohmert (R-TX) Alan Grayson (D-FL) Al Green (D-TX) Gene Green (D-TX) Parker Griffith (D-AL) Ralph Hall (R-TX) Phil Hare (D-IL) Alcee Hastings (D-FL) Michael Honda (D-CA) Shelia Jackson Lee (D-TX) Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) Ron Klein (D-FL) Frank Kratovil (D-MD) Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Steven LaTourette (R-OH) Daniel Lungren (R-CA) Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) Michael McCaul (R-TX) Howard ‘Buck’ McKeon (R-CA) Connie Mack (R-FL) Betsy Markey (D-CO) Kendrick Meek (D-FL) Charlie Melancon (D-LA) John Mica (R-FL) Brad Miller (D-NC) Candace Miller (R-MI) Jeff Miller (R-FL) Grace Napolitano (D-CA) Glenn Nye (D-VA) Pete Olson (R-TX) Ed Perlmutter (D-CO) Bill Posey (R-FL) Adam Putnam (R-FL) Laura Richardson (D-CA) Tom Rooney (R-FL) Ileana Ros Lehtinen (R-FL) John Salazar (D-CO) John Sarbanes (D-MD) Adam Schiff (D-CA) Aaron Schock (R-IL) David Scott (D-GA) Michael Simpson (R-ID) Adrian Smith (R-NE) Lamar Smith (R-TX) Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) Diane Watson (D-CA) Robert Wexler (D-FL) Charlie Wilson (D-OH) David Wu (D-OR) Bill Young (R-FL)[/i]

Questa è fantascienza. Scusate il messaggio privo di valore costruttivo, ma non riesco a vedere niente di neanche lontanamente simile da queste parti.
Ve la vedete una lettera bipartisan al Ministro del Tesoro prima di una finanziaria? Che chiede soldi per la Ricerca?

Sono sempre più curioso di vedere la piega che prenderanno i finanziamenti a Nasa negli anni a venire.

81 (bipartisan) su 435 membri che compongono il congresso,cioè il 18.6% sul totale.
Beh è una iniziativa da non disprezzare.

Da noi il bipartisanismo esiste solo quando (loro) si devono aumentare lo stipendio, di solito all’inizio della legislatura, o robe simili…

Iniziativa molto lodevole! E anche di una certa consistenza (18,6% grazie Sigismondo), non può certo essere messa in disparte senza nessuna considerazione… vedremo cosa ne scaturisce

Michael non ti hanno avvertito che gli USA sono su un altro pianeta rispetto all’Italia? Ma dove vivi? :wink: